Sunday, August 11, 2013

#Fukushima I Nuke Plant: Historical Radioactive Cesium Levels in Seawater Near Water Intakes Inside Plant Harbor - From 71 Million Bq/L to 200 Bq/L in 2 Years


(Warning: the post is very long. It's for my record.)

The post was being written for my Japanese blog in early August, but I may write it up for here as well for my record, in light of the off-handed remark of "300 tonnes of contaminated water leaking every day" by a career bureaucrat from the most powerful government ministry in Japan.

The remark was actually a mere assumption by the official and his office but was reported as "fact" by the reporters from Japanese and foreign media who were present at the press conference and who heard the official repeat the word "assumption" a number of times throughout the press conference.

It was not just established mass media but also some independent journalists who decided to go with the "300 tonnes of contaminated water" assumption, because it fits their narrative of hopeless situation at Fukushima (plant) and in Fukushima (prefecture).

The latest article (8/11/2013) by one of the independent journalists covering the nuclear accident presents an amazing story - a hearsay supposedly directly from workers at the plant that this "300-tonne-a-day contaminated water" is flowing like a river, no, it's worse, it's pouring out like a waterfall. Needless to say, this article in Japanese is being retweeted at a furious pace. No doubt it will be translated into English and spread throughout the world very soon, if not already.

After the remark by the METI bureaucrat was widely reported as "fact", the mental image held by people outside Japan (and many inside) seems to be that the "highly" contaminated water directly from the basements of the turbine building at Fukushima I Nuke Plant is flooding into the Pacific Ocean unchecked and polluting marine life, some experts claim as far away as in southern hemisphere.

The actual "highly" contaminated water, whose contamination is so high that it is expressed in Bq/cm3 instead of Bq/Liter (as in "millions of becquerels of radioactive cesium per cubic centimeter"), sits in the underground trenches coming from the turbine buildings. It's been mostly sitting there since April and May 2011.

These trenches may have been damaged by March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami, or by subsequent strong aftershocks, and part of this water may have been seeping into the layers of crushed stones beneath the trenches and into the surrounding soil, which then gets mixed with the groundwater that's been flowing from the mountain-side (west side) of the plant. Radioactive cesium, all-beta including strontium, tritium, and several other gamma nuclides have been detected in the sample water (probably this mixture of groundwater and the trench water) from the observation holes dug along the embankment.

The density of radioactive cesium in the sample water from the observation holes is expressed in liter instead of in cubic centimeter, as the contamination is far less than the water in the trenches, and as the contamination of seawater is measured in liter. Instead of millions of becquerels of cesium per cubic centimeter (or in liter, billions of becquerels) as in the water in the trenches, the sample water from the observation holes has between 10s and 1000s becquerels of cesium per liter.

And what about the seawater itself? The seawater samples have been taken almost every day since April 2011 from right outside the water intakes for the reactors, which is located along the embankment. TEPCO calls it "open culvert". Each water intake location is somewhat sealed off by silt screen, and the open culvert is also somewhat sealed off by silt screen from the rest of the plant harbor.

Diagram from TEPCO's "Enhancement of Monitoring Plan at the East Side of Unit 1-4 Turbine Buildings and in the Port at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station", 6/26/2013, showing the plant harbor and the open culvert area (in gray) where the water intakes are located. Silt screens are indicated in curved lines in red:


As of August 1, 2013, the highest measurement of radioactive cesium in seawater was 66 becquerels/liter of cesium-134, and 140 becquerels/liter of cesium-137, inside the silt screen of Reactor 3 water intake in the open culvert. Outside the silt screen, the numbers drop to 13 Bq/L for cesium-134, and 23 Bq/L for cesium-137.

Maximum amount of cesium in discharge water allowed for Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant BEFORE the accident, per liter:

  • Cesium-134: 60 becquerels/liter

  • Cesium-137: 90 becquerels/liter


From TEPCO's Nuclide Analysis Result Page (in Japanese only):

Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on August 1, 2013

  • Unit: Bq/L (liter)

  • Maximum density: Seawater at Reactor 3 water intake screen (inside the silt fence) Cesium-134 66 Bq/L, Cesium-137 140 Bq/L 





Now, going back in time, what was the density of radioactive cesium in the extremely contaminated water that was pouring out from the crack in the concrete wall near the Reactor 2 water intake screen in April 2011?

  • Cesium134 1.8 million Bq/cm3 (or 1.8 billion Bq/Liter)

  • Cesium-137 1.8 million Bq/cm3 (or 1.8 billion Bq/Liter) 

(Photo from TEPCO's Photos and Videos 4/2/2011)

What about the density of radioactive cesium in seawater when the above "highly" contaminated water was pouring out of the crack?

Nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on April 5, 2011:

  • Unit: Bq/cm3 (cubic centimeter, or 1/1000 of liter)

  • Maximum density: seawater at the Reactor 2 water intake screen Cesium-134 35,000 Bq/cm3 (or 35 million Bq/Liter), Cesium-137 36,000 Bq/cm3 (or 36 million Bq/Liter


The density of radioactive cesium in seawater then rapidly fell down. Nearly three months later, the density was low enough to be expressed in becquerels per liter, instead of becquerels per cubic centimeter.

Nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on July 31, 2011

  • Unit: Bq/L (Liter)

  • Maximum: Seawater in front of Reactor 3 water intake screen (inside the silt fence) Cesium-134 1,300 Bq/L, Cesium-137 1,500 Bq/L




Expressed in liter, the density of radioactive cesium in seawater went from 71 million Bq/L in April to 2,800 Bq/L in July, 2011.

By the end of 2011, the density of radioactive cesium in seawater right in front of water intake screens dropped to three digits, from 4 digits in July.

Nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on December 22, 2011

  • Unit: Bq/L 

  • Maximum: Seawater in front of Reactor 3 water intake screen (inside the silt fence) Cesium-134 310 Bq/L, Cesium-137 340 Bq/L




One year later in December 2012, the density further dropped to two digits, but still above the legal limit for discharge water from the normal nuclear power plant (Cs-134: 60 Bq/L, Cs-137: 90 Bq/L).

Nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on December 31, 2012

  • Unit: Bq/L 

  • Maximum: Seawater in front of Reactor 3 water intake screen (inside the silt fence) Cesium-134 40 Bq/L, Cesium-137 76 Bq/L




In early 2013, the density dropped below the legal limit of radioactive cesium in the discharge water from the normal nuclear power plant (again, Cs-134: 60 Bq/L, Cs-137: 90 Bq/L).

Here's from April 1, 2013, one day before TEPCO started the construction of the impermeable wall by driving down sheet piles with vibratory hammer along the embankment.

Nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on April 1, 2013

  • Unit: Bq/L 

  • Maximum: Seawater in front of Reactor 4 water intake screen (inside the silt fence) Cesium-134 17 Bq/L, Cesium-137 49 Bq/L




The data released on April 2 and April 3 do not show much difference. However, from the seawater sample taken on April 3, one day after the construction using sheet piles and vibratory hammer started, radioactive cesium was found again exceeding the legal limit for Cs-137.

Nuclide analysis of seawater inside the plant harbor, released on April 4, 2013

  • Unit: Bq/L 

  • Maximum: Seawater in front of Reactor 3 water intake screen (inside the silt fence) Cesium-134 59 Bq/L, Cesium-137 110 Bq/L




Depending on the locations, some samples show the density of radioactive cesium one order of magnitude larger than the samples taken before the start of the construction work, from two digits to three digits. Since then, the density of cesium in the seawater in front of water intake screens has been fluctuating between two-digit numbers and three-digit numbers.

Here's a chart plotting the density of radioactive cesium in seawater at the Reactor 3 water intake screen, inside the silt fence. It's a composite of the chart released on April 20 and the chart released on August 1. The thin red line indicates 10 to the power of 2 (1.0E+2). (Y-axis is in log scale.)


Toward the end of April, as the construction of the impermeable wall with sheet piles progressed, the density of radioactive cesium in seawater started to fluctuate wider.

Still, as far as radioactive cesium is concerned, the seawater in front of the water intake screens has not at all reached the level of contamination that obtained when the truly highly contaminated water from the Reactor 2 turbine building was pouring out into the ocean in April 2011.

It is safe, I believe, to assume that the highly contaminated water that still exists in the trenches and which has radioactive cesium in billions of becquerels per liter is not leaking in great quantity into the seawater yet.

If the density of radioactive cesium in the seawater in front of the water intake increases to 4 digit numbers per liter, I might start to worry. So far, it hasn't happened, despite TEPCO's (and METI/Agency of Natural Resources and Energy's) ill-conceived attempt to stop the groundwater flow with waterglass.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please explain your use of the word "yet." In English, the use of "yet" in negative sentences indicates something hasn't happend at this moment, but could eventually. Is this how you are using the word "yet"?

Anonymous said...

Hey, but everyone argues that drinking all of that cesium is exactly the same as eating a banana or riding an airplane, so it's absolutely safe!

Anonymous said...

Nice work on reported TEPCO numbers. Next numbers to help would be the new water levels created by the seaside underground dam combined with the elevations of the bottom of the trenches containing highly radioactive waters and the elevations of the the first three units base mats or even the bottom of the torus rooms.

If anything has been disturbed by recent construction, it would be the water tables (rising) and interacting with any melted core materials.

In the meantime, my guess is that any M6+ strike in a 30 mile radius will cause liquefaction at the site due to the rise in groundwater levels created by the underground dam construction and any subsidence will vary greatly depending on where the ground is saturated the most at the beginning of a quake that large.

Anonymous said...

Is the Torus of Unit #1 cracked? Thirty-two years(to the week) before Fukushima I was testing Safety Relief Valve hydraulic shock problems with GE Mark I and II BWR's. We took a break when TMI II Melted its core, and I watched the lies from Metropolitan Edison, and felt sincere sorrow for those folk who worked so hard on the nuclear dream only to see it become a nightmare threatening to kill us.

Now, we have a creaked Torus in Unit 1. They had 32 years to fix that problem. Unit #4 with something like 17,000 fuel rods in the spent storage pool is sinking.

The Fukushima Tragedy is just starting.

- George Kamburoff

Anonymous said...

laprimavera, since the contaminated water in the turbine and reactor buildings has been treated, at least partially, to remove cesium, isn't the comparison of cesium levels only a bit misleading in this case? Do we have reports of strontium levels from the early days too?

arevamirpal::laprimavera said...

Anon at 3:16PM, I am not using the contaminated water in the turbine buildings for comparison. The degree of contamination is one or two orders of magnitude lower than the water that's been sitting in those trenches.

There is no formal report, as far as I know, of all-beta including strontium in the contaminated water that leaked in 2011. Since the trench water is the same as those early contaminated water, the measurement of all-beta or strontium of the trench water may give you an idea. In the Reactor 2 cable trench, all -beta was 750 million Bq/L (750,000 Bq/cm3). Cesium-137 was 1.6 billion Bq/L (1.6 million Bq/cm3). See my post: http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2013/07/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-groundwater_26.html

Anonymous said...

Yes, I know. I was talking about the water in the reactors and turbine buildings, not the trenches. As you said, the water in the trenches seems to be the same water that was there back in March 2011 (just less Cs-134 because of decay), so that one is isolated to some extent from the one being treated and recirculated to cool the reactors.

Anonymous said...

Disaster and formal report are two things that can't co-exist on the same plane as human society.

Post a Comment