tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post2231373888001877188..comments2024-03-27T00:22:35.272-07:00Comments on EXSKF: 4/11/2011 Update on In-the-Ground Storage Pond Leaks at #Fukushima I Nuke Plant: How The Ponds Were Constructed the Same Way as Solid Waste Disposal Sitesarevamirpal::laprimaverahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10637620330944911600noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-60227663845282779312013-04-11T21:49:22.949-07:002013-04-11T21:49:22.949-07:00>When they discover three melted cores are free...>When they discover three melted cores are free to contaminate the environment<br /><br />Breaking news. Stop the presses.<br /><br />>with radioactively<br /><br />watAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-73042018712477792802013-04-11T17:29:33.709-07:002013-04-11T17:29:33.709-07:00Wait until reporters start tracking back to where ...Wait until reporters start tracking back to where the radioactive water came from. When they discover three melted cores are free to contaminate the environment with radioactively, won't they be surprised,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-23107546006166454302013-04-11T14:43:17.772-07:002013-04-11T14:43:17.772-07:00It's more like Asahi Fukushima reporters have ...It's more like Asahi Fukushima reporters have actually read the document or two that were posted at NISA's site, and are now archived at NRA. I'm writing a post.arevamirpal::laprimaverahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10637620330944911600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-11479847851892072572013-04-11T13:42:09.194-07:002013-04-11T13:42:09.194-07:00Laprimavera : do you have evidence for this NISA a...Laprimavera : do you have evidence for this NISA approval ? I guess Asahi Shinbun Fukushima local journalists misunderstood something, and are wrong. On the other hand I think you were correct when you wrote : "The in-the-ground storage, where the leakage occurred, was not supposed to be used for storing the waste water after the Reverse Osmosis (desalination) treatment" at http://ex-skf.blogspot.fr/2013/04/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-at-least-120.html . <br /><br />In http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/roadmap/images/m120730_07-j.pdf (dated July 30, 2012) page 01, the underground tank is mentioned as part of 処理水受タンク (treated water receiving tank), and on the diagram on page 17, it is mentioned as the receiver of 多核種除去設備 (multi-nuclide equipment) output.Anon at the topnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-25077351863848662742013-04-11T12:46:20.473-07:002013-04-11T12:46:20.473-07:00Anon at the top, it was NISA who approved the use ...Anon at the top, it was NISA who approved the use of the ponds for post-RO waste water in August 2012. So.. why shouldn't be they blamed? <br /><br />As Beppe says, NRA rubber-stamped it, and the chairman said the leak was beyond his expectation.arevamirpal::laprimaverahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10637620330944911600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-66164308648099277142013-04-11T05:32:28.560-07:002013-04-11T05:32:28.560-07:00NRA head admitted on TV they did not have the comp...NRA head admitted on TV they did not have the competency to assess Tepco plan to use a solid garbage disposal technique. If I got it right he also mentioned they did not know how to find any expert on the topic. Not a word of apology.<br /><br />BeppeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-50158418544699846022013-04-11T03:27:49.442-07:002013-04-11T03:27:49.442-07:00I think the NISA should not be blamed for approvin...I think the NISA should not be blamed for approving the August 2012 plan. Because at that time the plan for these underground tanks was to store the almost clean water expected to be produced by the multinuclide facility. <br /><br />Remember what you said : "The in-the-ground storage, where the leakage occurred, was not supposed to be used for storing the waste water after the Reverse Osmosis (desalination) treatment" at http://ex-skf.blogspot.fr/2013/04/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-at-least-120.html<br /><br />What is more questionable is the approval of the shift from a plan for almost clean water storage to a plan for RO waste water storage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com