tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post4510587640996535872..comments2024-03-27T00:22:35.272-07:00Comments on EXSKF: TEPCO: "Release of Radioactive Materials from Reactor 1 Building Will Be Small"arevamirpal::laprimaverahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10637620330944911600noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-66481512800871133282011-05-08T23:08:11.668-07:002011-05-08T23:08:11.668-07:00I saw that image, too. One of the readers of this ...I saw that image, too. One of the readers of this blog posted the link (http://leakspinner.wordpress.com/2011/05/08/evidence-of-fukushima-daiichi-reactor-fire-may-8th-2011/)<br /><br />No I don't know any more than anyone who watched the vid/photo. I'm posting the link on my Japanese blog and see if anyone over there know anything.arevamirpal::laprimaverahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10637620330944911600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-73684601122711381082011-05-08T16:07:26.612-07:002011-05-08T16:07:26.612-07:00At this point, all we have are rough estimates.
I...At this point, all we have are rough estimates.<br /><br />I don't vouch for those numbers (or any specific figures) because we have incomplete information and the situation is ongoing, but I do believe that many people will die because of cancers and birth defects related to this event. <br /><br />The risks form internal emitters (consumed radiation) are much, much greater than the risks from external exposure.<br /><br />European committee on radiation risk<br />http://www.euradcom.org/publications/chernobylebook.pdf<br />European committee on radiation risk<br />http://www.euradcom.org/<br /><br />Have you seen the images of smoke pouring from the plant last night? They can be found at enews and were posted 5/8. Do you know anything about that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-17861521357901262162011-05-07T17:24:41.898-07:002011-05-07T17:24:41.898-07:00↑ If anyone has the energy to check my math I woul...↑ If anyone has the energy to check my math I would appreciate it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-47815801548755989862011-05-07T17:23:38.078-07:002011-05-07T17:23:38.078-07:00Majia, I looked at your blog. I'm not sure the...Majia, I looked at your blog. I'm not sure the data is showing what you think it is showing. For example, the graph from Cologne is showing a trend which will result in a concentration of 20 becquerels of CS137 per square meter on the US West Coast by December 2011. 20 becquerels per square meter is 20,000,000 becquerels per square kilometer. Converted to curies this is .0005 curies per square kilometer. The temporary exclusion zone for Chernobyl was established at 5 curies per square kilometer. This was the lowest level of contamination for which they relocated people. In order for California to reach this level, the Cesium would have to be 185,000 per square meter (or, 9250 times the current level). Even if we assume that California will continue to accumulate 20 becquerels every six months for the next 30 years, it will still only be at 1/154th of the level of the lowest level of evacuation of Chernobyl - but after 30 years the radioactivity will be reduced by half, and so the actual radioactivity will by 1/154 * 50%. One could argue that this level is still too high, but it certainly would not cause the millions of deaths that is mentioned in your blog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765307840677473617.post-9645841099480417252011-05-07T13:46:17.827-07:002011-05-07T13:46:17.827-07:00Evidence and discussion on ongoing LARGE releases ...Evidence and discussion on ongoing LARGE releases of Cesium<br />http://falloutphilippines.blogspot.com/2011/05/heres-proof-that-composition-of-recent.html<br /><br />http://globalcooperative.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/lies-from-every-official-mouthpiece/Majia's Bloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04941091700194936591noreply@blogger.com