Here they come.
Zero Hedge has this post:
The Treasury Is Soliciting Your Feedback Regarding The Proposed Annuitization Of 401(k) (2/1/2010)
"Yes, slowly but surely it is happening. In a federal notice filed earlier, the DOL and Treasury are soliciting a response on what has been on many investors' mind, namely the process of converting 401(k)s into annuity-like products. To wit:
The Department of Labor and the Department of the Treasury (the "Agencies") are currently reviewing the rules under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the plan qualification rules under the Internal Revenue Code (Code)to determine whether, and, if so, how, the Agencies could or should enhance, by regulation or otherwise, the retirement security of participants inemployer-sponsored retirement plans and in individual retirement arrangements"A cursory read of the document does not seem to ask about a flat out regulatory requirement for annuitization. We point your attention to item 13:
(IRAs) by facilitating access to, and use of, lifetime income or other arrangements designed to provide a lifetime stream of income after retirement. The purpose of this request for information is to solicit views, suggestions and comments from plan participants, employers and other plan sponsors, plan service providers, and members of the financial community, as well as the general public, on this important issue.
13. Should some form of lifetime income distribution option be required for defined contribution plans (in addition to money purchase pension plans)? If so,"For readers who feel compelled to respond to this increasignly socialistic and ludicrous development, we suggest you voice your anger at the following address:
should that option be the default distribution option, and should it apply to the entire account balance? To what extent would such a requirement encourage or discourage plan sponsorship?
e-ORI@dol.gov. Include RIN 1210-AB33 in the subject line of the message"
This blog has reported on this issue since June last year, most recently in this post in January 2010. As I said in my previous posts on the matter, this idea has been put into words by non-governmental entities - Brooking Institution (Mark Iwry) and Heritage Foundation (David John).
After virtually running around on the Internet trying to locate the document that Zero Hedge is citing (Department of Labor has such a hostile site for people looking for information), I've finally found it. Here it is:
DEPARTMENT of LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration What I'm wondering is this:
Is this a regulation that would require Congressional approval, or could it be signed into law by an executive order signed by the president?
If it is the latter, then we could wake up one day and find out that we would be required to liquidate at least portion of 401K/IRA and buy some special Treasury securities that we would have to keep for 10, 20, 30, 40 years.
Again, should you wish to protest (or support, I guess, if you are hard-core socialist), the email address is: e-ORI@dol.gov, and include RIN 1210-AB33 in the subject line.

Tokyo Time
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)