Friday, November 19, 2010

Wired: Web Censorship Bill (SB 3804) Sails Through Senate Committee

Republicans took back the House in the November election, but is anything going to be different? So far, the answer is absolutely not. Democratic leaders are more than ever determined to push through their pet legislations as quickly as possible during the lame duck session.

This particular bill, however, apparently has the bipartisan support, and is sailing through the Senate. It will give the Attorney General the right to shut down websites without due process.

The government is happily doing the bidding of the influential industry, again, as it has done for the pharmaceutical industry and insurance industry in the health care 'reform' bill, as it has done for the financial industry in the financial 'reform' bill, and as it will certainly do for the ag industry in the food bill (ex-Monsanto food czar will make sure of it).

Web Censorship Bill Sails Through Senate Committee
(Sam Gustin, 11/18/2010 Wired)

Who says Congress never gets anything done?

On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously approved a bill that would give the Attorney General the right to shut down websites with a court order if copyright infringement is deemed “central to the activity” of the site — regardless if the website has actually committed a crime. The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) is among the most draconian laws ever considered to combat digital piracy, and contains what some have called the “nuclear option,” which would essentially allow the Attorney General to turn suspected websites “off.”

COICA is the latest effort by Hollywood, the recording industry and the big media companies to stem the tidal wave of internet file sharing that has upended those industries and, they claim, cost them tens of billions of dollars over the last decade.

The content companies have tried suing college students. They’ve tried suing internet startups. Now they want the federal government to act as their private security agents, policing the internet for suspected pirates before making them walk the digital plank.

Many people opposed to the bill agree in principle with its aims: Illegal music piracy is, well, illegal, and should be stopped. Musicians, artists and content creators should be compensated for their work. But the law’s critics do not believe that giving the federal government the right to shut down websites at will based upon a vague and arbitrary standard of evidence, even if no law-breaking has been proved, is a particularly good idea. COICA must still be approved by the full House and Senate before becoming law. A vote is unlikely before the new year.

Among the sites that could go dark if the law passes: Dropbox, RapidShare, SoundCloud, Hype Machine and any other site for which the Attorney General deems copyright infringement to be “central to the activity” of the site, according to Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group that opposes the bill. There need not even be illegal content on a site — links alone will qualify a site for digital death. Websites at risk could also theoretically include p2pnet and pirate-party.us or any other website that advocates for peer-to-peer file sharing or rejects copyright law, according to the group.

In short, COICA would allow the federal government to censor the internet without due process.

Read the full article at the link above.

The article says "a vote is unlikely before the new year", but don't count on it. Nancy and Harry want to move as fast as they can and pass as many bills as possible during the lame duck session. The lineup should be very disheartening for those who thought the November election signaled a major change in the government.

Nothing has changed. Dems are doubling down, Republicans are letting it slide, and Obama is outside the country since the election.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

You mean SB 3804.
HR 3804 deals with national parks.
Honest mistake, I guess. Just be careful to vet things.

arevamirpal::laprimavera said...

Thank you, yes that what I meant, SB3804. I was writing about HR3808 also, and got the prefix mixed up..

Post a Comment