On September 27 the Ministry of Education and Science announced the result of their latest aerial survey of radiation contamination they did over Gunma Prefecture, and many people are dismayed that the contamination in the prefecture looks worse than feared.
So far, the Ministry has done the aerial surveys and mapped air radiation and soil contamination in: Fukushima, Miyagi, Yamagata, Ibaraki, Tochigi, and Gunma.
From 9/27/2011 map, on air radiation (microsievert/hour, 1 meter off the ground):
Cesium-134 and -137 deposition (becquerels/square meter):
Professor Hayakawa's map that he's been updating since April (current version is 4.0):
30-Day free trial by following the link.
Tokyo Time
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
23 comments:
Nice maps.
Well, looks like I'll never make it to Tohoku afterall...
East-West divide anyone?
Why does the radiation seem to stop at Saitama?
Ummm - that microSievert map is one meter off the ground?
Well - the radiation in that recent train out of Tokyo video had 10 microSieverts per hour in the train 1 meter off the ground!!
"Why does the radiation seem to stop at Saitama?"
not surveyed (yet)
I'm happy to see that is has been proven, everything TEPCO and the Japanese Government was "understating" were bold face lies!
So, don't believe ANYTHING they release!
The danger is deadly.
The danger is all around.
The danger is to trust the so called "experts."
Time to evacuate from Japan. Tried to delay until today but after seeing these maps, hmm....
Dear Tony,
Yes, go back to where you came from. Have a nice flight.
Oh, noooooooooooo!!!
Closely looking at the map, the survey raster appears to be about one square kilometer.
But, dangerous hotspot areas can be much smaller and so the map only shows an overall tendency.
And, even worse, Cesium precipitation is different to Strontium precitiation due to different properties of these contaminants (solubility, adherance to other particles like dust and so on).
So it is not possible to deduct that an area with little Cesium contamination is fit for agricultural use, as it could be heavily polluted with other radiocontaminants than Cesium.
You need to have contamination maps for every important radiopollutant to be on the safe side.
Just check out the different contamination maps for Cesium, Strontium and Plutonium in the former Soviet Union.
I recommend all to study this big and detailed report about the Chernobyl consequences some commenter hinted at a few days days ago:
http://docs.google.com/gview?url=http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov+Chernobyl+book.pdf&pli=1
Atomfritz
"Just check out the different contamination maps for Cesium, Strontium and Plutonium in the former Soviet Union."
Yeah, just check how Strontium and Plutonium are distributed over a smaller area, with lower concentrations and closer to the plant.
anon 7:23
No.
Either you didn't check it out yourself or you are trying to disinform.
Look at the maps on pages 13 to 23 of the document (these are on total pages 34 to 44)
If you overlay these maps you'll quickly find out that the distribution of radionuclides is very dissimilar.
There even are widespread intensive transuranic (Plutonium etc) contaminations in many areas many hundreds of kilometers away from the Chernobyl NPP that have practically no Cesium or Strontium contamination.
Go! Go! Über Fritz!
Wahrheit! Wahrheit!
anon 11:58
Ermm. I am not all uber.
If I were, I could, for example, scientifically explain why the maps (from Ukraine government) on page 17 (absolute page #38 of the document) do not seem to support the theory that plutonium fallout only occurs where cesium falls out.
I do not understand why plutonium fallout is high in some areas where no relevant cesium fallout has been found. Please especially look at the southern-southwestern regions.
But, I agree with you in another point.
Truth (= "Wahrheit" in german) should be told to all and not only to the nuclear cartel insiders.
I am sure many people all over the world appreciate the work of LaPrimavera (who is being called "Ultraman" sometimes) for his great efforts to tell the world the truth. What he does really deserves the word "uber".
I think I am only one of many many people who are grateful to him. Thanks again!
Some would say that Yablokov is trying to disinform. Actually, a lot of very smart people have said that. I'm sure they all just work for the nuclear industry though.
Dear Anon 2:47
could you please substantiate your claims? Who are these 'some' you are talking about? Can you provide a link? Who are these 'smart people' you are talking about? Any links available?
I do not know about the credibility of Yablokov, but at least I know his name and I can check his data and conclusions (form the link). Your statement is pure fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), the information content of your post is ZERO (NIL - NADA)
Atomfritz,
I have studied those maps. I couldn't get Yablokov's book from your link, though, I downloaded it here: http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf
If you check the maps for Belarus (pages 14-16 of the report), for example, you see that Strontium-90 and Plutonium are distributed on lower concentrations on a smaller area closer to the plant.
In the case of the comparative map, the Yablokov's book omitted the units used in the second map. If you go to the source, Ukraine National Report 2006, you can check the raw data, table 2.2.3, 2.2.5, 2.2.6 (Pages 16-20): chernobyl.undp.org/english/docs/ukr_report_2006.pdf Again, smaller area, closer to the plant, lower concentrations.
I'm getting a reading of over 650 cpm in Shizuoka September 29 4:45 pm. The readings started spiking at 4:40 pm.
???
anon 6:16
Thank you for the correction of my mistyped link.
In fact the raw data show the same discrepancies as you can find when overlaying the contamination maps.
For example, Ukraininan westernmost oblast Zakarpatska, hundreds of kilometers west of Chernobyl, shows high plutonium contamination in contrast to comparatively low cesium contamination.
So the theory spread by the nuclear lobby that plutonium contamination concentrates near the accident sites seems definitely to be wrong. (I have to admit that I also believed that deception until I looked closer at the facts that usually are kept classified.)
However, it is essential for the nuclear industry to maintain their lie that it is sufficient to look at cesium contamination only.
Because, if people would look at other contaminants and not only at cesium, they would recognize that the contamination damage is way larger and more widespread than being suggested to the public.
An important part of the deception is the belief that lower becquerel counts automatically mean less health risk.
This is grossly wrong because of various reasons.
First, as internal alpha radiation damage is officially considered at least twenty times more dangerous than gamma damage. So 100 Bq of plutonium are considered as dangerous as 2000 Bq of cesium.
Second, as plutonium is way longer lived than cesium, 100 Bq of plutonium contamination is much, much more pollution than 2000 Bq of cesium when you look at the weight/mass of the contaminants.
Third, plutonium does not conveniently decay in a few generations like the short-lived cesium. It causes quasi-permanent degradation of the land.
Fourth, as plutonium usually is in the form of hot particles, it is way more "efficient" in causing cancers.
And so on.
It is really sad to find how dense this web of deceptive lies is that the nuclear lobby spreads together with the mass media.
Atomfritz, I understand why you chose Zakarpatska as an example of your theory, as it's the only one which seems to correspond to it. Nice selection bias.
Still, compared to the other regions it had 91.5% of its territory contaminated with 40–100 Bq/m2 of Plutonium, as opposed to 35% contaminated with 2,000-4,000 Bq/m2 and 51% with 4,000-10,000 Bq/m2 of Cs-137.
It's interesting that, among this ranges, you decided to use the highest value for Plutonium and the lowest one for Cs-137. ("So 100 Bq of plutonium are considered as dangerous as 2000 Bq of cesium.")
Any comments on the maps of contamination by Cs-137, Sr-90 and Plutonium in Belarus?
Ha ha, check out the nuclear lobby shill. Anonymous of course.
Nice try to twist Atomfritz's message and score off a strawman tactic. He pointed out that Plutonium was 20 times worse than Cesium for danger due to this being the statistical relation between internal alpha radiation and gamma radiation. Not because there coincidentally was the same ratio between the highest and lowest concentrations of each as well.
Nice try though, your determination to strike a blow for nuclear power industry shows a lot of determination if nothing else. I hope they reward you for your efforts with a nice little dose of plutonium waste, since you seem to be fairly fond of the stuff.
I was diagnosed with stage 3 breast cancer in August 2010. A valuable friend told me about Dr. Itua Herbal Center in West Africa. She gave me her phone number and email address. I quickly contacted him to guarantee that his herbal medicines will heal my cancer and I will heal forever I said OK.I ask him what is the healing process, he asks me to pay the fees I did and within 7 working days he sent me the herbal medicine and then he asked me I told my friend Gomez about the herbal drug so that he gave me to go and drink it.So after drinking for two weeks, I was cured, I am so grateful and I promise that I will do it I recommend to anyone who has cancer and that that I am doing. Herbal medicine Dr. Itua makes me believe that there is hope for people with Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, scoliosis, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, kidney cancer. , Leukemia, lung cancer, skin cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer Fibromyalgia,
Fibrodysplasia Syndrome, Epilepsy,Sclerosis sickness, Dupuytren's Disease, Diabetes, Celiac Disease, Angiopathy, Ataxia, Arthritis, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Alzheimer's Disease, Lupus, Adrenocortic Carcinoma.Asthma, Allergic Diseases.HIV Help, Bladder cancer,Brain cancer,Esophageal cancer,Gallbladder cancer,Gestational trophoblastic disease,Head and neck cancer,Hodgkin lymphoma
Intestinal cancer,Liver cancer,Melanoma,Mesothelioma,Multiple myeloma,Neuroendocrine tumors
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma,Cervical Cancer,Oral cancer,Ovarian cancer,Sinus cancer,Soft tissue sarcoma,Spinal cancer,Stomach cancer
,Testicular cancer,Throat cancer,Meniere's disease,Thyroid Cancer,Vaginal cancer,Vulvar cancer
HIV Aids, Herpes, Disease Chronic inflammatory, Memory disorder,
Here is his contact information ...... [Email ... drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com. Whatsapp ... + 2348149277967]
I am here to give my testimony about Dr Ebhota who helped me.. i want to inform the public how i was cured from (HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS) by salami, i visited different hospital but they gave me list of drugs like Famvir, Zovirax, and Valtrex which is very expensive to treat the symptoms and never cured me. I was browsing through the Internet searching for remedy on HERPES and i saw comment of people talking about how Dr Ehbota cured them. when i contacted him he gave me hope and send a Herbal medicine to me that i took for just 2 weeks and it seriously worked for me, my HERPES result came out negative. I am so happy as i am sharing this testimony. My advice to you all who thinks that there is no cure for herpes that is Not true just contact him and get cure from Dr Ebhota healing herbal cure of all kinds of sickness you may have like (1) CANCER,(2) DIABETES,(3) HIV&AIDS,(4) URINARY TRACT INFECTION,(5) CANCER,(6) IMPOTENCE,(7) BARENESS/INFERTILITY(8) DIARRHEA(9) ASTHMA(10)SIMPLEX HERPES AND GENITAL(11)COLD SOREHERPES. he also cure my friend from cervical cancer Email: drebhotasoultion@gmail.com or whatsapp him on +2348089535482
Post a Comment