Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Japanese Government Now Admits 675 Radiation Monitoring Posts Show "10% Lower" Than Actual Levels, "Beyond Expectation" Says Ministry of Education


Why 10% lower? Because the led battery was shielding the radiation detector.

How convenient.

From Kyodo News (11/7/2012):

現地の放射線量10%低く表示 監視装置675カ所改修へ

Radiation levels displayed 10% lower, 675 monitoring posts to be repaired

 政府の原子力災害対策本部は7日、空間放射線量を測定するため、福島県や周辺県に設置した放射線監視装置(モニタリングポスト)で、10%程度低い空間線量が表示されていたとして、675カ所で改修工事を行うと発表した。

The Nuclear Disaster Response Headquarters of the Japanese national government announced on November 7 that the radiation monitoring posts set up in Fukushima and the neighboring prefectures have been showing air dose levels about 10% lower [than the actual levels], and that the repair work will be done on 675 of them.

 装置内で金属製の箱に覆われたバッテリーが検出器の隣に設置されていたため、放射線が遮られていた。

The metal box containing the battery is placed next to the radiation detector inside a monitoring post, blocking the radiation.

 住民や自治体から実際の線量と異なるという指摘を受け、機器の位置を変更し、より正確な表示を目指す。

Residents and municipalities [in these prefectures] have pointed out that the levels displayed by the monitors are different from the dose levels [that they measure], so the government will modify the location of the equipment and try to have a more accurate reading.

 東京電力福島第1原発事故を受け、政府は公共施設や観光地などにモニタリングポストを設置し、今年4月から文部科学省のホームページで測定結果を公開していた。

In response to the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant accident, the national government has set up the radiation monitoring posts in public buildings and tourism destinations, and the monitoring results have been available on the homepage of the Ministry of Education and Science since this April.


Jiji Tsushin says it was the lead storage batteries right next to the monitoring post shielding radiation from the ground, and there are 545 monitoring posts in Fukushima, and 130 in neighboring Miyagi and Yamagata and other prefectures (the article doesn't say where).

10% lower. And that's on top of the reduction of radiation by replacing the soil/concrete around the monitoring posts, and after a sizeable decrease in cesium-134 (half life 2 years) in the environment.

The original vendor contracted to build these monitoring posts (Alpha Tsushin) was summarily dismissed in November last year after their monitoring posts displayed the radiation levels "too high" for the comfort of the Ministry of Education. The current monitoring posts are supplied by Fuji Electric, one of the top four heavy electric companies including Hitachi, Toshiba, and Mitsubishi, and Hitachi-Aloka Medical.

These four companies do a healthy business contracting from the national and local governments on large and small public projects. Always go extra miles to please the price-insensitive customers.

Jiji Tsushin's article also says:

同省はバッテリーの遮蔽(しゃへい)効果を想定していなかったという。

Ministry of Education says it did not expect the shielding effect of the batteries.


Yeah right. I can almost hear the conversation that may have taken place between an official at the Ministry of Education and the favored vendors like Fuji Electric and Hitachi:

Official: "We have a problem. Alpha Tsushin's monitoring posts are scaring the residents. The numbers are just too high, and we don't think it's right to scare people who have suffered so much (and whom we need to stay put where they are). So we're going to fire the vendor. What can you offer?"

Fuji, Hitachi: "Well, we could build monitoring posts that display more reasonable numbers."

Official: "Do it. I don't care how you do it, and don't tell us how you do it."

7 comments:

SouthJerseyJoey said...

how surprising!!! NOT.

Anonymous said...

Very sad that the public had to discover this problem instead of the government agency that commissioned them. There are some bureaucrats who should be looking for new jobs. We need to hold them accountable.

Anonymous said...

A lead battery?? Why a lead battery? Just for its shielding properties or is there a plausible technical reason?
Beppe

Anonymous said...

Who wants to bet the 10% number is actually higher? So here's a "baseless rumor" that turned out to be true I wonder how many other "rumors" are based in facts. How long did it take the locals to convince MEXT they were on to their shenanigans?

"Ministry of Education says it did not expect the shielding effect of the batteries."

Yeah, who would ever think that something as dense as lead would shield the device. This is like shooting someone and then being bewildered that the lead bullet penetrated their body.

"It seems the density of the lead in conjunction with the speed of its trajectory actually did kill all these people, sorry about that we'll try harder MEXT time".

Isn't the best way to fix this problem to outlaw private radiation monitoring. I'm surprised the JGOV didn't demand the private detectors be turned in for "proper" calibration.

Anonymous said...

At this point, it's clear the government decided that abandoning the country wasn't an option, and they forced that decision onto everyone else by downplaying the situation and ridiculing anyone opposing their views.

These actions made it difficult for anyone to seriously consider evacuating. I wonder how things would have turned out if they'd fully supported and respected people who wanted to leave?

Atomfritz said...

Hehe, thank you for that (maybe not-so) fictional company-ministery "conversation", that was a good smile.
Now I imagine Hitachi workers cleaning up the measurements spots like the Beagle Boys clean up a crime scene :)

@ Beppe
Lead batteries are convenient and cheap solar power backup devices. Can be charged via the telecom line, too.
Good also as pole counterweight. Not so cold-sensitive like high-tech batteries.
It's just a matter of relative positioning of battery/sensor, and applying a calibrated correction factor.

Silver Salmon Fishing said...

Very nice blog, thanks for your generous info. More power to you!

Post a Comment