Friday, June 28, 2013

Japan's Nuclear Regulatory Authority Blasts #Fukushima I Nuke Plant Revised Plan for Decommissioning As "Pie In The Sky"


The original Japanese is "drawing a picture of mochi (sticky rice cake)" - it may look nice but can't be eaten.

Sadly, their severe criticism won't make a bit of difference.

Japan's Nuclear Regulatory Authority had a meeting with TEPCO on June 28, 2013 to hear what TEPCO/government had to say about their new and improved decommissioning plan for Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, which proudly proclaims the corium (fuel debris) will be taken out of the reactors "ahead of schedule".

NRA's commissioners' response was: So what? What's the point of doing it "ahead of schedule" when you don't even know how to seal containment vessels that are leaking?

To that, TEPCO/government answer was: It is really very meaningful to do it "ahead of schedule".

In other words, they were from different planets.

Summary of the meeting from Jiji Tsushin (6/28/2013):

前倒し「絵に描いた餅」=規制委、工程表を批判-福島原発

NRA criticizes the Roadmap for decommissioning Fukushima I Nuke Plant as "pie in the sky"

東京電力福島第1原発事故の廃炉作業の安全性を監視する原子力規制委員会の検討会が28日、開かれた。政府と東電などの廃炉対策推進会議が核燃料の取り出し時期を前倒しする工程表をまとめたことに対し、専門家から「段取りが見えず、実感が持てない」「絵に描いた餅」など批判が相次いだ。

A meeting was held on June 28 at the Nuclear Regulatory Authority in charge of monitoring the decommissioning of Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant and assuring the safety of decommissioning work. Experts at NRA criticized the revised roadmap from the government and TEPCO that would remove [melted] nuclear fuel [from the reactors] ahead of schedule, as "no concrete steps to do it ahead of schedule, unreal" and "pie in the sky".

新たな廃炉工程表は1、2号機の原子炉内で溶けた燃料の取り出し開始を、これまでより1年半早い2020年6月にするなど、計画の一部を前倒しした。

The revised schedule for decommissioning specifies the start of fuel debris removal from Reactors 1 and 2 as June 2020, one and a half year ahead of the original plan.

検討会で、メンバーの渡辺明福島大教授は「溶融燃料の取り出しが大きな意味を持つのは分かるが、現状では最終目標。1年半の前倒しに何の意味があるか分からない。着実な計画を見せてもらい、地元に説明するのが大事だ」と指摘。規制委の更田豊志委員も「絵に描いた餅に見える。いかなる根拠があって前倒しできるのか釈然としない」と批判し
た。

Professor Akira Watanabe of Fukushima University said in the meeting, "I understand the removal of fuel debris means a lot, but it is the ultimate goal at this point. What's the point of doing it one and a half year ahead of schedule? What's more important is to show a solid (credible) plan and explain it to the people in the affected areas." NRA's Commissioner Toyoshi Fuketa criticized by saying "It looks like pie in the sky. I don't see the basis on which [the removal of corium] can be done ahead of schedule."

更田委員は、第1原発の観測用井戸の検査結果などから、海に流出した疑いが強まっている汚染水への対応の記載が少ないことにも不満を見せ、「最終的な取り出しより、今あるリスクを下げることが目の前の目標だ。工程表が何を示そうとしているか、分からなくなってきた」と苦言を呈した。

Commissioner Fuketa was not happy either that the roadmap had only few mentions of countermeasures against contaminated water. Judging from the result of analysis of the water taken from the observation wells at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, contaminated water may have leaked into the ocean. Commissioner Fuketa criticized [TEPCO/government], and said "The immediate goal should be to lower the current risks, not the ultimate removal [of fuel debris]. I don't understand anymore what this roadmap is trying to show."


IAEA really spoke the truth when it advised TEPCO/government to picture the end state - what is it that you want to achieve? How do you get there?

The government entity that was severely criticized by the NRA commissioners and experts is the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy within the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. The Ministry is headed by Mr. Toshimitsu Motegi, the original "ahead of schedule because he says so" guy.

To the critical commissioners and experts at NRA, the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, which oversees the nuclear industry, said during the 3-plus-hour meeting (from the tweet from someone who actually watched the entire meeting live):

  • The medium/long-term roadmap was already decided and confirmed yesterday, and it is hard to change anything right now.

  • There is a certain hazard to fuel and fuel debris. It means a great lot to remove them sooner.

  • We've written "safety first" in the roadmap.

That's comforting, isn't it? They wrote in "safety first".

By the way, there is apparently no "Plan B" if the fuel debris cannot be removed. The Agency for Natural Resources and Energy said in the meeting that the reason why the concrete steps toward removing the fuel debris ahead of schedule was not mentioned in the roadmap was because they couldn't figure out those steps yet.

Looking at TEPCO's plan for fuel debris removal, as posted at NRA's site, it is painfully clear that TEPCO was told by the Agency what to write (garbage).

So, this meeting between TEPCO/government and NRA, as with many (if not most) meetings in a "democratic" society, is just to keep up the appearance, so to speak. NRA has been consulted, never mind that the commissioners and experts blasted their plan. For TEPCO and the government, particularly the government, a mere gesture of consulting with NRA is more than enough for procedural purposes.

Now they can proudly announce "We have a great plan, and we have even spoken with NRA about it, and the fact that they met with us means the plan has been approved. It's ready to go."

They now get to squander more taxpayers' money for "pie in the sky".

7 comments:

James Graham said...

I need to stay alive during these years coming up and I really am more afraid of the outcome here in the US than anything else I can imagine going wrong in this time period. If you all let me down, I will haunt you forever in any afterlife that may exist, and plague your conscience now and forever more.

Anonymous said...

Just in time for the Mars Olympics in 2002200!

Anonymous said...

According to Arnie Gundersen the clean up costs for Fukushima are 500 billion dollars. I don't know how he came up with that number but I would bet it is roughly accurate.

There needs to be an international team of independent scientists and engineers to come in and figure out what to do, but the bumbling and incompetent racists in the Japanese government cannot allow that.

The Japanese government is to blame, Tepco is expected to do a miracle when they do not have the technical expertise, or the money to do what they need to do, which is technically feasible (to some extent at least well beyond what they are "achieving at this point) but not when you are working with duct tape and fuck wits.

http://wilcoxrb99.wordpress.com/

Anonymous said...

It was DPJ administration under Kan, Edano which was so xenophobic that they flat-out refused the help from the US NRC in the first few weeks of the accident, arguably the most critical time period. Their reasoning? If they let the US run the accident response, the US will re-occupy Japan!

International so-called experts like Gundersen are not really welcome for all the BS they have spewed over the past two years, not because they are foreigners.

Anonymous said...

At anon @ 12:49:
"... international so-called experts like Gundersen ..." I'd be perfectly happy with just about any kind of international, independent team. It has been pretty clear to many if not most people who thought about it that it does not make sense to have a company, i.e., TEPCO, run the clean-up process since they have a financial interest in doing as little as possible as cheaply as possible. Level of expertise is more or less a secondary issue since really no one has expertise with this kind of a mess.
*mscharisma*

Anonymous said...

>I'd be perfectly happy with just about any kind of international, independent team.

I wouldn't. I would rather have scientists and engineers who have received funding from so-called "nuclear village" AND actually know something about the latest techs, issues, in nuclear industry. Level of expertise DO matter, so that they can better figure out what to do with the mess.

Gathering an international team of anti-nuclear activists posing as "experts" won't solve a thing.

Anonymous said...

At anon @ 1:06:

It all depends on the reference point. What you're preferring and describing would be the ideal, also in my opinion. What I was saying is that, compared to TEPCO running the show, just about any independent team comprised of people who know their way around nuclear reactors would be better. In any case, no one said they would have to be anti-nuclear to begin with.
*mscharisma*

Post a Comment