Tuesday, August 13, 2013

#Fukushima I Nuke Plant: In-the-Ground Water Storage Ponds Are "Floating" Because of Groundwater Pressure


It's one thing after another at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant. Today, it's the floating ponds.

Remember those in-the-ground water storage ponds that leaked back in April? They were originally constructed for storage of treated water. But as TEPCO was running out of above-the-ground steel tanks, TEPCO consulted with the then-regulator Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency bureaucrats and experts in August 2012. NISA officially allowed the use of these in-the-ground water storage ponds for highly contaminated, post-RO (reverse osmosis) waste water with high beta.

The ponds were lined with thin liners, as if they were garden ponds, and the water leaked. That was not what the elites at TEPCO and NISA were expected. TEPCO was forced to move the waste water into above-the-ground steel tanks.

These ponds have stood empty since May/June. Well of course they float.

Now, TEPCO announced that they found two of these ponds "floating", or bulging in the center. TEPCO doesn't say why, but Asahi Shinbun (8/13/2013) speculates it may be from the groundwater pressure:

貯水槽40センチ浮く 福島第一原発、地下水の浮力か

In-the-ground water storage ponds float 40 centimeters [max] at Fukushima I Nuke Plant, probably due to buoyancy from groundwater

東京電力は13日、福島第一原発で4月に汚染水が漏れた地下貯水槽が最大40センチ浮き上がったと発表した。周囲を流れる地下水によって浮力が生じたことが原因とみられる。汚染水は地上タンクに移送され、貯水槽は空だった。東電は、新たな汚染水の漏れはないと説明している。

TEPCO announced on August 13 that the in-the-ground water storage ponds at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant which leaked contaminated water in April were found floating maximum 40 centimeters. It is probably due to buoyancy created by groundwater flowing around the ponds. The contaminated water has been transferred to the above-the-ground tanks, and the ponds are empty. TEPCO says there is no fresh leak of contaminated water.

 東電によると、高濃度の汚染水が入っていた3号貯水槽(縦56メートル、横45メートル、深さ6メートル)が最大約40センチ浮き上がり、5、6号機の建屋地下の低濃度汚染水を入れていた4号貯水槽(縦40メートル、横25メートル、深さ6メートル)も最大約15センチ浮き上がった。

According to TEPCO, the Pond No.3 (56 x 45 x 6 meters) that contained highly contaminated water is floating maximum 40 centimeters, and the Pond No.4 (40 x 25 x 6 meters) that contained low-contamination water from the basements of Reactors 5 and 6 buildings is floating maximum 15 centimeters.

 3、4号貯水槽は、いずれも1~4号機の建屋の山側にある。1日千トンの地下水が流れているという。貯水槽周辺の地下水位は4月から1メートル程度上昇したという。

The Pond No.3 and the Pond No.4 are located west (mountain-side) of the reactor buildings. According to TEPCO, 1,000 tonnes of groundwater is flowing there per day, and the groundwater levels in the area where the in-the-ground ponds are located have risen by 1 meter or so since April.

 対策として東電は、地下貯水槽の上に50センチほどの砂利を敷き、重しにする。ゲリラ豪雨などで急に地下水位が上がった場合は、地下貯水槽の周囲の井戸から地下水をくみ出し、別の地下貯水槽に移すという。

As a countermeasure, TEPCO will put a 50-centimeter layer of gravel at the bottom of the ponds as weights. If the groundwater levels suddenly rise due to heavy rain, TEPCO will draw groundwater from the wells around the ponds and move the water to different ponds.


Uh... musical ponds?

Why don't they simply pump up the groundwater there and put it in these ponds?

It was just too bad and extremely short-sighted for TEPCO and NISA to use these ponds for highly contaminated waste water. They could have used these ponds to store clean groundwater before it goes anywhere near the reactor buildings and from there released into the ocean.

From TEPCO's handout for the press, 8/13/2013, Pond No.3:

6 comments:

netudiant said...

Surely the only thing that is 'floating' is the liner, adrift on the water building up below.
Why TEPCO is not using this as independent proof that the liners are air and water tight is another matter...

Anonymous said...

One way of desensitizing people to the catastrophe is to get the sheeple diverted with diagrams, bequerels, tank linings, robots,liters of water, etc to give the impression that some "scientific" solution is being put in place.

Mike said...

Why isn't the treated (and cooled) wastewater being reused for cooling, rather than stored? Reuse would eliminate or at least reduce the storage problems. I would think that reusing contaminated water in an already contaminated environment would pose no new risks.

Mike

arevamirpal::laprimavera said...

Mike, treated water has been being reused for cooling the reactors. Problem is that they treat more water than necessary for cooling, and the excess has to be stored somewhere.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 3:09AM, on the other hand, there are lots of people, organizations, news media that do the opposite - not talking becquerels, not showing diagrams, not checking facts, etc. - in order to fan the fears and get eyeballs.

anot arnold said...

It has relevant information. Thanks for posting this. Your blog is so interesting and very informative.Thanks sharing. Definitely a great piece of work Thanks for your work.
storage in kamloops

Post a Comment