Tuesday, December 31, 2013

(For Record) #Fukushima I NPP Reactor 3 Operating Floor Situation Summary as of 12/31/2013


The post is for my own record and for those who missed the news in July this year about the steam rising from a gap near the shield plug on the operating floor of Reactor 3 at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant.

For more posts on the subject, go here.

0. The steam looks like this:


TEPCO's hypothesis from July is that it is part rainwater part leak from the Containment Vessel.

1. The steam was first noticed in July this year, and since then it has been observed numerous times when and after it rains in the geographical area where the plant is located in Fukushima Prefecture (Futaba-machi and Okuma-machi on the Pacific Ocean). It has probably been there since after the March 2011 explosion. Why wasn't the steam noticed earlier? Most likely because of piles of debris on the operating floor, which looked like this from the top, until September 2012 when TEPCO/Kajima started to remove the debris:

(March 24, 2011)


(Video taken on 11/5/2011)


2. Infrared images, taken on July 24 this year, from TEPCO (labels are mine), showing a warm spot with a red X (34.3 degrees Celsius, or 93.74 degrees Fahrenheit) right where the steam was (and still is, occasionally) rising:


3. The air dose rates (gamma radiation) on the operating floor of Reactor 3, particularly around the shield plug, are very high (the latest measurement from November and December this year, presented at the December 26, 2013 meeting to discuss progress of the "roadmap toward decommissioning" - PDF file in Japanese):

The upper numbers: air dose rate in millisievert/hour, at 5 meters off the floor
The lower numbers: localized surface rate in millisievert/hour, measured by a survey meter fitted with collimeter, at 50 centimeters off the floor

(I marked the location of the steam with a blue X.)


But it is more likely that the high air dose rates are not from the occasional weak steam from the spot as seen in the infrared images above, but from the contamination from the fallout in March 2011, from several vents including dry vent (releasing the highly radioactive gas inside the Containment Vessel to outside, without having it go through water to reduce radioactive materials) and the March 14, 2011 explosion of Reactor 3 and steam/smoke afterwards. The steam/smoke in March 2011, as TEPCO casually admitted during the regular press conference on July 24, 2013 (there was no follow-up question from the press), came from a breach in the Containment Vessel of Reactor 3, "as you all know".

As a piece of that evidence,

4. Nuclides analysis result of the radioactive materials in the air, July 25, 2013 shows radioactive cesium in the air where the steam is observed on the operating floor of Reactor 3 is two orders of magnitude lower than the density limit by the nuclear regulation, at 3.3E-05 Bq/cm3 (3.3x10^-5 Bq/cm3 or 0.000033 Bq/cm3, or 0.033 Bq/L, or 3 Bq/m3) for cesium-137, too low to account for several hundred millisieverts per hour radiation:


5. Reactor 3's Spent Fuel Pool is filled with debris big and small, but there are fuel assemblies inside the pool which are cooled with water (water temperature at 11.2 degrees Celsius as of 12/27/2013, from TEPCO's handout for the press.

Video taken in May 2011:

Video taken in September 2012:

Video taken in February 2013:

Again, photos of the Reactor 3 operating floor: (from TEPCO's photos and videos library) March 16, 2011:

March 24, 2011:

July 11, 2012:

September 21, 2012 (SFP, when TEPCO started removing the debris):

May 25, 2013:

October 10, 2013:

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

In the October 10, 2013 picture it looks like they remove the trolley crane assembly that was laying across the top the of reactor. Wonder if removing the weight and pressure made things worse or better. Must have spread all kinds of radioactive dust around the site while they were clearing Unit 3.

Anonymous said...

This discussion about the nature and source of the steam is surreal. It's akin to standing in the middle of a forest, with a raging fire approaching from all sides, and having to debate whether the pine trees, or oak trees, or brushwood, are the source of the flames.

FFS, get over this intellectual onanism

Anonymous said...

"a warm spot .. (34.3 degrees Celsius, or 93.74 degrees Fahrenheit)" 34C has got to be a lot less than this early infrared,

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/bernanke/heatAll.jpg

Is 34C commonly associated with steaming?

"several hundred millisieverts per hour radiation"

Is several hundred millisieverts radiation associated with steaming?

Using that above infrared image and Reactor #2 building as an example. The view in 1,3, and 4 is down thru water in the SPFs. You are not seeing the sources themselves.
The outer walls of 2 are uniformly heated by steam. You are not seeing the steam source itself.

Some source in 3 is well above 34C and is producing transitory steam events.

Anonymous said...

anon at 1:22AM, it will be far better use of your time if you go to sites that discuss nothing but raging forest fire, whether the fire is actually there or not. Not here.

Anonymous said...

Anon@11:56am

Thank you for making my point so succinctly.

A Loa said...

Ways to look at prior to getting cash advance
Ahead of obtaining an advance payday loan, try to understand each of the loan stipulations talked about within the deal by a salaryday loan provider. Ahead of signing this deal, question the financial institution to understand about the company's background as well as get them to be growing up or over.text loans direct lenders

Post a Comment