From Kyodo News (2/14/2012):
福島第1原発2号機で原子炉圧力容器底部の温度計の数値が異常に上昇した問題で、東電は14日、他の温度計の点検を進め、圧力容器に41個ある温度計のうち計8個に異常がみられると発表した。
As the temperature at the bottom of the Reactor 2 Pressure Vessel shot up extremely high, TEPCO announced on February 14 that the company had conducted the test of 41 thermocouples on the RPV, and found 8 of them showing abnormality.
一時、400度を超えた温度計1個のほか、2個に温度を測るもととなる電気抵抗値に異常が見つかった。残りの5個は故障と判断していた。東電は残る33個の温度計で圧力容器全体の温度傾向を監視する。
In addition to the thermocouple that exhibited the temperature above 400 degrees Celsius, 2 other thermocouples had abnormal electrical resistance. 5 had been deemed broken. TEPCO will continue to monitor the temperature trend of the RPV with the remaining 33 thermocouples.
経産省原子力安全・保安院から、故障とみられる温度計に代わる温度監視の策を求められたことについて、東電は「新たに温度計を設置するのは難しい。実現可能性含め対応したい」としている。
As for the request from the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency to submit a plan to monitor the temperatures at the locations where the thermocouples failed, TEPCO says, "It is difficult to replace the thermocouple, but we would like to consider further whether it is possible at all."
8 out of 41 showing abnormality? That's not quite what I read in the TEPCO's report in December 2011. Page 1-64 of the report has a table that shows the numbers of thermocouples in Reactors 1, 2, 3 that were evaluated with equivalent circuit. In the case of Reactor 1 RPV,
No. of thermocouples that can be used with equivalent circuit: 32
No. of thermocouples that cannot be used with equivalent circuit: 1
No. of normal (functioning) thermocouples: 2
So, as far as I can understand (correct me if I'm wrong, as I could be very wrong) one of the 32 thermocouples on the Reactor 2 RPV shows a certain value, and TEPCO compares it with the value of the equivalent circuit, and figure out over time whether the value shown by the thermocouple can be used after equivalent circuit calibration.
TEPCO's report says the standard deviation for Reactor 1 RPV's thermocouples is about 15 degrees Celsius, and 8 degrees Celsius for Reactor 2 RPV's thermocouples. Thus the margin of 20 degrees Celsius mentioned by TEPCO for the maintenance of "cold shutdown state", I think, to be on the safe side of 15 degrees Celsius.
The report says 14 thermocouples on the Reactor 3 RPV can be used with equivalent circuit calibration, while 18 thermocouples cannot. There is no normal thermocouple on the Reactor 3 RPV.
Hmmm. Maybe it is Reactor 3 we should be worrying about.
FYI, the latest temperature information of Reactor 3's RPV is here.
3 comments:
if i was russia i'd be flying my turboprops around the outer edges of this dump, too.
nothing like a cold shutdown war.
migrating tumors in #1 and #2... rods from #3 blown out 2km away... and humpty dumpty sitting on a wall in #4.
nice fucking life japan.
They are compensating for degraded thermocouples. As the wires corrode, resistivity increases. One measures the increase and derives a "true" reading from this.
The big scandal that probably affects all still-operating Mk-I and II reactors and probably many others is that two-wire thermocouples were used instead of more expensive four-wire-ones.
Four-wire cabling would have allowed for more intensive instrument diagnostic.
It would have allowed for separate cable and instrument analysis.
But with only two wires, Tepco can just state they found "abnormal resistance", but not tell if it was due to cable failure, moisture, thermoelement degradation/shifting or a combination of.
Post a Comment