Still moving. It's a protracted process... (Sigh). Have to test the DSL modem at the new place, but I'm sure Murphy will be there waiting.
For your entertainment while I'm gone, here's the plant layout and geological map for Hamaoka Nuclear Power Plant. Anything wrong with it? Green boxes are reactor buildings, blue boxes are turbine buildings. Both images are from http://onodekita.sblo.jp/article/45215822.html (in Japanese):
For comparison, here's Fukushima I's layout:
30-Day free trial by following the link.
Tokyo Time
戦争の経済学
-
ArmstrongEconomics.com, 2/9/2014より：
戦争の経済学
マーティン・アームストロング
多くの人々が同じ質問を発している－ なぜ今、戦争の話がでるのか？
答えはまったく簡単だ。何千年もの昔までさかのぼる包括的なデータベースを構築する利点の一つは、それを基にいくつもの調査研究を行...
10 years ago
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
4 comments:
Let me guess, no tsunami wall at Hamaoka?
BTW, how about the radioactive bonyu? In Tokyo, no less....
isnt there supposed to be only 4 plants there?? i read in another article... or does 1 and 2 count as one??? did the tsunami hit here badly....?? reactor 5 looks a bit vulnerable....did the rock suffer liquification (its supposed to be a kind of sandstone i believe) wasnt there radioactive tea picked near here?....arghh ...did i miss anything??/ ....more questions than opinions....
There are 5 reactors at Hamaoka, 1,2 being decomissioned, 6th being planned.
One answer to "What's wrong with Hamaoka Nuke Plant?": Look at the location of the turbine buildings (blue boxes on the map). In Fukushima and any other nuke plant, turbine buildings are on the ocean side, partly no doubt to protect the reactor building if tsunami hits. Not so in Hamaoka. The reactor buildings will be hit first.
I would recommend my profile is important to me, I invite you to discuss this topic. 37 celsius to fahrenheit
Post a Comment