For all Naoto Kan fans, here's the link at Nico Nico Video (you need an account if you don't have one):
http://live.nicovideo.jp/watch/lv93459134?ref=nicotop
At IWJ's USTREAM Channel:
http://t.co/aU6Of2kC
(Watching the testimony at Nico Nico)
He's now blaming Haruki Madarame.
Why was he in the meeting with the opposition leaders to begin with on March 11, 2011 when the situation deteriorated rapidly in Fukushima I Nuke Plant?
Just like Yukio Edano, Kan is busy painting himself as "victim" who was left out of the info loop.
About TEPCO "withdrawal" - Kaieda came in the morning of March 15, 2011.
...
It was the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency who declined help from the US, one of the commissioners just said.
30-Day free trial by following the link.
Tokyo Time
戦争の経済学
-
ArmstrongEconomics.com, 2/9/2014より：
戦争の経済学
マーティン・アームストロング
多くの人々が同じ質問を発している－ なぜ今、戦争の話がでるのか？
答えはまったく簡単だ。何千年もの昔までさかのぼる包括的なデータベースを構築する利点の一つは、それを基にいくつもの調査研究を行...
10 years ago
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
5 comments:
So are these investigations supposed to figure out what the actual situation is, what the hell they're going to do or should have done, or are they just there for politicians to point fingers at each other?
I recall reading that the Russians did the exact same thing for Chernobyl - pointing the finger. Methinks the important lessons of these disasters are not being learned.
Yes.
ExSKF, you are right be be skeptical of Kan. I don't know, I just read the article by Jeff Kingston that puts the finger more on the Nuclear Village and less on Kan, although Kan was not perfect. You might get something out of his analysis, what do you think? It was partly the nature of the bureaucratic system. He is frustrated, we all are. Now we have Hosono in there, with his Law degree, saying Unit 4 looks good and thumbs up! Totally absurd.
Ousting Kan Naoto:
The Politics of Nuclear Crisis and Renewable Energy in Japan
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Jeff-Kingston/3610
Mismanaging Risk and the Fukushima Nuclear Crisis
http://japanfocus.org/-Jeff-Kingston/3724
Sorry, OT :
A new robot for Fukushima power plant :
http://www.cio.com.au/article/425745/japan_robot_lab_readies_second_prototype_work_crippled_nuclear_reactor/
“It is impossible to ensure safety sufficiently to prevent the risk of a national collapse,” Mr. Kan said. “Experiencing the accident convinced me that the best way to make nuclear plants safe is not to rely on them, but rather to get rid of them.”
Enough said?
Do it now please.
Post a Comment