Quince No.2 did not find visible damage to the building interior, but got 505.6 millisieverts of radiation exposure for the 4-hour work.
Earlier, human workers went down to the Torus Room of Reactor 2 trying to photograph the level of water inside the Suppression Chamber with an infrared camera to estimate the location of the leak. They were unsuccessful, probably due to steam on the surface of the water.
Reactor 2 is more scary to me than Reactor 3 or Reactor 4. No visible damage anywhere, yet it has released the most radioactive materials. Thermocouples keep failing, and such a high radiation out of nowhere.
From Sankei Shinbun (6/13/2012):
2号機5階で毎時880ミリシーベルト 福島第1
Fukushima Daiichi (I) 880 Millisieverts/hour on 5th floor of Reactor 2
東京電力は13日、福島第1原発2号機の原子炉建屋内部をロボットを使って調査し、5階の原子炉の真上にあたるコンクリート床付近で、毎時880ミリシーベルトの放射線量を計測したと発表した。作業員の5年間の被曝線量上限にあたる100ミリシーベルトに約7分間で達する値で、東電は「5階に人が立ち入っての作業は困難」とみている。建屋内に目立った損傷はなかったという。
TEPCO announced on June 13 that it conducted the survey of the interior of the Reactor 2 building using a robot, which measured the 880 millisieverts/hour radiation near the concrete floor on the 5th floor right above the reactor. The 5-year cumulative maximum radiation exposure for nuclear workers (100 millisieverts) would be reached in about 7 minutes at that location. TEPCO thinks it will be difficult for [human] workers to enter the 5th floor. According to the company, there was no visible damage to the interior of the building.
国産の災害対策支援ロボット「クインス」の改良型が、5階まで自走して測定した。今回、最高値を計測した場所のコンクリート床の厚さは約2メートルで、格納容器の上端から約3.5メートル離れているという。
The improved version of "Quince", robot developed in Japan for disaster response support, went up to the 5th floor and measured the radiation. The concrete floor with the highest radiation level this time is about 2-meter thick, and about 3.5 meter away from the top of the Containment Vessel.
約4時間にわたる調査で、ロボットの被曝(ひばく)線量は505.6ミリシーベルトで、作業員9人の被曝線量は最大で3.95ミリシーベルトだった。
The robot got 505.6 millisieverts of radiation exposure in the 4-hour survey, and the 9 [human] workers got the max 3.95 millisieverts.
There is no data yet on TEPCO's sites (English or Japanese). I'll post when they do.
8 comments:
"scary"? naw ..it's the only leaky tomb so far.
if i'd get a free wish, i'd wish no.1, two and four would be the same amount of "scary".
-BUT-
maybe a domesticated zombie, e.g. a zombie with enough exposure to a TV running mass-media (reactors no1, no3, no4), is less scary then a zombie behind glass walls(no2)?
Poor workers. Anyone see the photo of the critically ill nuclear worker in the hospital burn unit? Terrible way to die..7 minutes..as long as they consider they may not know all the areas of high radiation. Those badges--dont trust them much..but hey..its at least something for comparison sake. Not much however.
Workers will get sick, have cancers, have heart attacks, deformed children, diabetes..and no proof what caused the damage. A FREE GET OUT OF JAIL FOR TEPCO!
And they can't wait to restart Ooi.
Idiots.
800+ mSv/hr. Wow ...
The bosses should put a camera into the pressure vessel by way of yet another pipe. Probably nothing inside, just a tube open at the bottom.
If the fuel melted straight down and burned through the bottom of the containment, the damage would be invisible from the torus room. Rads from the core would find their way everywhere within the building. Water would be leaking straight down as well, into the ground under the reactor.
Lead bricks: build an area where workers can automate the two big gantries and use them to remove the spent fuel. That job could start tomorrow ...
Over year and still nobody knows exactly what the situation is. How can they honestly state everything's safe and good? This is such a simple realization to make, yet the majority of the human populace remains ignorant.
I do NOT like the reference to floor thickness and distance from reactor vessel at all. It means someone somewhere considered the possibility that some of it might be gamma from the reactor vessel. But that would mean insanely high doses at the source.
Does anyone know if this is just gamma, or beta+gamma, or what?
> Does anyone know if this is just gamma, or beta+gamma, or what?
Beta is harder to measure. It's gamma. Probably from nuclides deposited by the steam - Unit 2 was steaming for a long time (a month or so) back then.
Thanks, Quince.
Post a Comment