Correction from TEPCO regarding the analysis of water in the turbine building of the Reactor No.2. The company is simply not used to disclosing information, any information, to total strangers; when they are forced to, they panic, and give some wild information which they have to retract a few hours later, adding to confusion.
Better than not telling anything, I suppose.
From Asahi Shinbun and other papers (3/28/2011):
It was cesium-134 (half life 2 years), not iodine-134 (half life 52.5 minutes);
It was 100,000 times the normal level of reactor cooling water, not 10 million times.
Now you know. Rest assured everything else is OK at the plant.
In the meantime, we await the test result of soil samples for plutonium in a few days.
戦争の経済学
-
ArmstrongEconomics.com, 2/9/2014より:
戦争の経済学
マーティン・アームストロング
多くの人々が同じ質問を発している- なぜ今、戦争の話がでるのか?
答えはまったく簡単だ。何千年もの昔までさかのぼる包括的なデータベースを構築する利点の一つは、それを基にいくつもの調査研究を行...
10 years ago
0 comments:
Post a Comment